Use of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) in Research with Informal Caregivers: A Scoping Review

Authors

  • Mateus Silveira Adriano
  • Maria Suely Alves Costa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC2678aasrh1

Keywords:

Cognitive fusion, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, review, informal caregiver, PRISMA-ScR

Abstract

Cognitive fusion, a core concept in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), refers to the rigid adherence to thoughts, contributing to psychological distress. The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) is a psychometrically validated tool for measuring this process. This study conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, to map the use of the CFQ in research involving informal caregivers. A search across eight databases yielded 16 studies published between 2014 and 2025, mainly from Spain and the United States. Participants were predominantly women, with a mean age of 62, caring for people with dementia. Most studies had cross-sectional designs, using the Spanish and CFQ-7 versions, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.79 to 0.97. The most frequent dependent variables were depressive symptoms, anxiety, caregiver burden, and values satisfaction; independent variables included psychological interventions and sociodemographic characteristics. Higher levels of fusion were associated with greater distress, while reduced fusion correlated with improved well-being. ACT-based interventions showed promising results. Limitations included cross-sectional designs and convenience samples. The findings suggest that the CFQ is a useful tool for assessing cognitive fusion in caregivers, but highlight the need for longitudinal and culturally diverse studies to strengthen the evidence base.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Adriano, M. S. ., & Costa, M. S. A. . (2026). Use of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) in Research with Informal Caregivers: A Scoping Review. Perspectivas Em Análise Do Comportamento, 17(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC2678aasrh1